Rajya Sabha Bill No. LXXII of 2026 | Amendment to the MSMED Act, 2006 | UPSC / PCS Mains: GS-3 (Economy, MSME), GS-2 (Legislation, Centre-State) | Prelims: MSME, TReDS, MSEFC, Udyam
Background and Context
If a small supplier's invoice stays stuck with a buyer, its capital stops right there. The MSME Development Act, 2006 already has a dispute-resolution framework for this problem: a council, mediation and arbitration. According to the Bill's statement of objects, this Act needs amendment in the changed circumstances, and delayed payment is a major item on its list. This article reads the sections of the Bill that grip payment at three points: at the settlement of the invoice, at the timeline of a dispute, and at the challenge and recovery after a decision.
What Is the News?
On 28 July 2026 the Bill was introduced in the Rajya Sabha. On one side it makes the settlement of CPSE invoices through TReDS mandatory; on the other, it has separate clocks for a dispute: 90 days for mediation, 30 days for referral to arbitration, 90 days for the award, and a 75% deposit if the award is challenged in court, of which at least 50% goes to the supplier after six months. Along with these there is "turnover" in the classification, voluntary digital registration and a graded system of penalties. The later dates (passage, gazette, notification) are set out in a separate row below.
Key Facts and Figures
| The Bill | The Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026, "AS INTRODUCED IN THE RAJYA SABHA ON THE 28TH JULY, 2026", Bill No. LXXII of 2026. 17 sections. Printed at the end of the Statement of Objects and Reasons: "NEW DELHI; The 24th July, 2026." and the name JITAN RAM MANJHI. |
|---|---|
| Classification (clause 4, new section 7(1)) | The Central Government may, "by notification", classify enterprises into micro, small and medium, "subject to such limits as it may consider necessary as to both of the following criteria": (a) "investment in plant and machinery or equipment" and (b) "turnover". The rupee limits are not printed in the new text. In the Bill's annexure, the quotation of section 7 of the 2006 Act prints the old figures: in manufacturing, ₹25 lakh, ₹5 crore and ₹10 crore on plant and machinery; in services, ₹10 lakh, ₹2 crore and ₹5 crore on equipment. |
| Registration (clause 5, new section 8) | The Central Government "shall notify" "a national digital platform for free and voluntary filing of memorandum"; a State Government "may notify a State digital platform". Explanation: a State Government may extend the "applicable benefits" of its schemes to enterprises registered on the central platform as well. |
|---|
| TReDS (clause 7, new section 15A) | "every Central Public Sector Enterprise shall ... route the settlement of invoices through a Trade Receivables Discounting System platform, authorised by the Reserve Bank". Sub-section (2): the Central Government may by notification specify any other authority, body or institution. Sub-section (3): a State Government may specify the State's public sector enterprises etc. Clause 13 (new section 22A): such enterprises have to "disclose" the details of invoices settled through TReDS. |
|---|
| Timelines (clause 8, section 18) | (3A): mediation "within a period of ninety days from the date fixed for first appearance". (4): the council "within a period of thirty days from the date of termination of mediation" (the old text of the further action is not printed in the Bill; PRS and PIB describe it as referral to arbitration). (4A): award "within a period of ninety days from the date of completion of pleadings". Sub-section (5): jurisdiction lies with the council where the supplier's registered "official address" under section 8 is, and the buyer may be "located anywhere in India". Sub-sections (6)-(7): the Central Government may notify arrangements for online mediation or arbitration through audio-video means. |
|---|
| Recovery (clause 9, new section 18A) | A mediated settlement agreement or arbitral award "may be recovered as an arrear of land revenue by the State Government through District Collector or Deputy Commissioner or any such authority notified by the State in this behalf, where the assets of the buyer is located". Sub-section (2): the determined amount is "a valid and legally enforceable debt" and "liable to be recognised under the provisions of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016". These words are the Bill's; we have not assessed their legal effect. |
|---|
| Challenge in court (clause 10, section 19) | (1) An "applicant (not being a supplier)" must deposit "seventy-five per cent." of the amount of the award or mediated settlement agreement; only then will the application be "entertained". (2) While the application is pending the court "shall order" that "such percentage" of the deposited amount be given to the supplier as the court considers "reasonable". Proviso: if the application remains pending "more than six months", "at least fifty per cent. of the amount awarded" out of the deposit. (3) The application lies in the court where the supplier's "official address" is. Our calculation: if the deposit is exactly 75% of the award, payment of 50% amounts to two-thirds of the deposit (50 ÷ 75). |
|---|
| Councils (clauses 11-12, sections 20-21) | The State Government will by notification create an "adequate number" of councils "in addition" to the existing one; a council "shall meet on regular basis". Composition: "not less than three but not more than five members"; chairperson "not below the rank of Joint Director"; one or more representatives of small industry associations; "at least one member from the field of law". |
|---|
| Penalties (clause 14, sections 27 and 27A) | False information or violation of section 26(2): the first time "warned"; the second time or later a "penalty" of ₹1,000 to ₹50,000. Violation of section 22 by a buyer: the first time a warning; the second time a "penalty" of ₹10,000 to ₹50,000; the third time or later "punishable with fine" of ₹50,000 to ₹1 lakh (the words are the Bill's). After the date of commencement, the "ten per cent. of minimum amount of penalty" is added every three years. Our calculation, at the first stage: 1,000 to 1,100; 10,000 to 11,000; 50,000 to 55,000 rupees (we have not determined the later stages or the method of calculating the increase). Adjudicating officer: the Development Commissioner; appeal: to the Secretary of the Government of India in charge of the ministry or department having administrative control of MSMEs, within 30 days; disposal of the appeal in "sixty days". |
|---|
| Statement of Objects and Reasons | According to the statement, the proposed purposes of the amendment are: a national digital platform; CPSE invoices through TReDS; additional councils; "faster adjudication"; recovery "as arrear of land revenue"; "at least fifty per cent." from the court; "decriminalise ... replacing conviction-based fines with graded penalties by including warning at the first instance". Financial memorandum: "not likely to involve any expenditure ... from and out of the Consolidated Fund of India". |
|---|
| Status (as printed on PRS Bill Track) | Printed on PRS Bill Track: introduced in the Rajya Sabha Jul 28, 2026; passed by the Rajya Sabha Aug 03, 2026; passed by the Lok Sabha Aug 07, 2026. Both dates of passage (3 and 7 August) are also printed in PIB's original press release (7 August 2026, 8:30PM). The Bill's introduction date (28 July) falls in the July period; the dates of passage are later. |
|---|
| Later developments (beyond July) | Gazette of the Act: The Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II Section 1, No. 32, 13 August 2026, Ministry of Law and Justice (Legislative Department). Printed: "The following Act of Parliament received the assent of the President on the 13th August, 2026", "No. 16 of 2026". Notification: Part II Section 3(ii), 12 October 2026, S.O. 5575(E), Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises: for sections 2 to 7, section 11 and sections 13 to 17, 15 October 2026; for section 12, 15 December 2026. No date is printed in this notification for sections 8, 9 and 10. In our comparison, the words of sections 2 to 17 of the Act match clauses 2 to 17 of the Bill (the Bill's statement of objects and the memoranda are not in the copy of the Act). |
|---|
| Context figures printed by PIB (in their words) | In the PIB fact sheet (11 August 2026): according to the Economic Survey 2025-26, MSMEs account for "31.1% of GDP, 35.4% of manufacturing output and 48.58% of exports"; "As on August 2026, 9.16 crore MSMEs are registered on the Udyam platform, employing more than 40 crore people"; 161 MSEFCs; the ODR Portal "launched in June 2025"; the value of invoices on TReDS "₹40,000 crore in 2022-23 to ₹3.47 lakh crore in 2025-26". PIB's 7 August release prints "1.65 crore as on 01.04.2023 to 9.16 crore now" on Udyam and the words "volume of invoice discounting" for TReDS. These are claims of the ministry/PIB; we have not matched them with the Economic Survey or the Udyam portal. Our calculation (both figures in the same unit): ₹3.47 lakh crore = ₹3,47,000 crore; 3,47,000 ÷ 40,000 = 8.675, that is about 8.7 times. |
|---|
| What was not found printed in the Bill | The consequence of time running out in section 18's new timeline clauses (3A, 4, 4A); the rupee values of the new classification limits; a fixed number of councils for a State (the text has "adequate number"); any figure of outstanding payments. |
|---|
Analysis: Gripping Payment at Three Points
The first point, three layers. The Bill does not grip the question of payment at one place. The first layer is before a dispute: CPSE invoices will be settled through TReDS (section 15A), and their details will be "disclosed" (section 22A). The second layer is the dispute: the council and the clocks of mediation-arbitration (section 18). The third layer is after the decision: the deposit on challenge (section 19) and recovery (section 18A). In the examination, an answer on "delayed payment" stays clearer when written divided into these three layers.
The second point, why the clocks do not add up. 90, 30 and 90 days sound like 210 days (our calculation: 90 + 30 + 90), but all three start differently: "date fixed for first appearance", "date of termination of mediation" and "date of completion of pleadings". How much time can pass between these dates is not printed in the text. So giving any figure for the total period would be going beyond the Bill's text. The consequence of missing the timeline is also not found printed in these clauses; "not found printed" does not mean "does not exist".
The third point, the economics of a challenge. In section 19 the one making the deposit is the "applicant (not being a supplier)", and the payment of at least 50% to the supplier after six months is out of that same deposit. Those are all the conditions of the text. The PIB fact sheet writes this as "the court may direct that a reasonable portion of the deposited amount be paid", while the Bill prints "shall order". Both words belong to their sources; we have not merged them, and in the examination it would be right to keep the Bill's text as the basis.
The fourth point, the change in classification. The new text of section 7(1) keeps two criteria, investment and "turnover", but the rupee limits are not in the text; they are left to "such limits as it may consider necessary". That is, the real limits will come in a later notification. PRS writes this as "thresholds will be specified by notification".
The fifth point, Centre and States. The registration platform, the TReDS lists, the councils and several rules are printed separately for both the Centre and the States (sections 8, 15A, 20, 21, 29, 30). In a GS-2 answer, write this as "printed text of separate jurisdictions of both", without claiming any effect.
The sixth point, the language of "decriminalise". The statement of objects describes "graded penalties" in place of "conviction-based fines". But section 27(2)(c) prints "punishable with fine" for the third violation while (b) of the same section prints "penalty". We do not draw out the legal meaning of this difference of words; in the answer keep both words as printed.
Way Forward: Unanswered Questions
- No date is printed in notification S.O. 5575(E) for sections 8, 9 and 10 (timeline, recovery, deposit on challenge). Whether there is a separate notification or not, we have not seen. So nothing can be said about the commencement of these three sections.
- The new rupee limits of classification, the rules for routing invoices into TReDS and the States' rules are left in the text to later notifications. Whether they have been notified or not, we have not seen.
- We have not seen the underlying tables of the figures printed by PIB (31.1%, 48.58%, 9.16 crore, 40 crore, TReDS); they have been taken as statements of the ministry/PIB.
Points Useful for the Examination
Prelims: the MSMED Act, 2006; Udyam registration; TReDS; MSEFC; mediation and arbitration; "arrear of land revenue"; Development Commissioner; the process of an amendment bill (introduction, passage, assent, notification, phased commencement). Mains: the three layers on delayed payment (invoice, dispute, recovery); timelines and their starting points; the deposit on challenge; the separate Centre and State provisions; delegated legislation; writing figures with the names of their sources.
Sources
- The MSME Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026, as introduced in the Rajya Sabha (copy placed on PRS)
- PRS Bill Track: The MSME Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026
- PIB, Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises: release on the passage of the Bill (7 August 2026)
- PIB Research: The MSME Development (Amendment) Bill, 2026, fact sheet (11 August 2026)
- The Gazette of India (Extraordinary), 13 August 2026: The MSME Development (Amendment) Act, 2026 (egazette.gov.in)
- The Gazette of India (Extraordinary), 12 October 2026: notification S.O. 5575(E) (egazette.gov.in)
Source limits: the Bill's text is from the copy placed on PRS. The dates of introduction and passage are from PRS Bill Track and the PIB release; the dates of passage (3 and 7 August 2026) fall outside the July period. The gazette of the Act (13 August 2026) and the notification (12 October 2026) were read from egazette.gov.in; the date of assent is printed in the gazette as "received the assent of the President on the 13th August, 2026". The words of sections 2 to 17 of the Act match those of the Bill; the statement of objects is not in the copy of the Act. PIB's figures have been taken as PIB's statements. We have not checked the date for sections 8, 9, 10, the States' rules, the new classification limits or the present implementation of any provision.
Remember: the article is on the text of the Bill as introduced. Three layers: invoice (TReDS), dispute (clocks) and after the decision (75% deposit, 50% payment, recovery). The days of the clocks are not added together, and no date for sections 8-10 is printed in the notification.
Download This Article: PDF
